Controversia
Facts Instead of Fiction
Numerous experts and researchers have noted the prevalence of misleading statements regarding CDS (chlorine dioxide). This section aims to present factual and accurate information to correct misconceptions and clarify any confusion related to this topic.
Beobachter
Chantale Hebeisen, a journalist from the Springer Press publication Beobachter, launched a personal attack, or ad hominem assault, on Dr. h.c. Andreas Ludwig Kalcker. This attack was characterized by a journalistic style that is known for its defamatory nature, resembling a typical smear campaign aimed at undermining Dr. Kalcker's credibility by asserting that CDS supposedly does not work against Covid-19. In response to her claims, she received an overwhelming total of 196 emails from doctors located all over the globe, who have successfully utilized CDS in their practice and wished to share their experiences supesssing the data and changing the narrative deliberatly.
Alleged German doctor accused of promoting chlorine dioxide and four people in charge of marketing it in the country
https://www.fiscales.gob.ar/
You can accuse anyone in any place, but the important question is whether there was a trial or not. In this specific case, it is a well-established fact that there was no trial held against Dr. Andreas Kalcker it was 3rd party that sold ClO2 products. Furthermore, it has been proven clearly that there was no direct relation to other individuals who were involved in the case. Curiously, this crucial information is not readily available or easily found in the public domain, which raises questions about transparency and access to information regarding such cases.
Case in Neuquén, Argentina, of a deceased boy allegedly due to CDS.
In the case that has arisen in Neuquén, Argentina, concerning the tragic death of a young boy, there are serious allegations surrounding the use of CDS (Chlorine Dioxide Solution). This unfortunate and controversial case is not directed against Dr. Kalcker, as some might assume; rather, it is primarily focused on the parents of the boy. Just a few days prior to the child’s hospitalization, the parents had allegedly given him a small amount of CDS to drink. However, after some time had passed, the boy tragically passed away in the hospital due to what many are now calling medical malpractice.
In a shocking turn of events, the medical professionals involved attempted to shift the blame onto the parents, suggesting that their actions were the cause of the boy's death. Nonetheless, forensic experts conducted thorough examinations and clearly stated that there was no link between the CDS administration and the child's demise. In fact, further investigations revealed that the boy was suffering from a significant deficiency of chlorine (CL) in his body, which would make it virtually impossible for the use of CDS to have been the contributing factor to his unfortunate passing. This case has sparked considerable debate and raised questions about accountability and the treatment protocols in place within the medical community.
Video where the forensic expert gives an interview in the radio:
