Controversia
Facts Instead of Fiction
Numerous experts and researchers have noted the prevalence of misleading statements regarding CDS (chlorine dioxide). This section aims to present factual and accurate information to correct misconceptions and clarify any confusion related to this topic.
Beobachter (Springer press)
Chantale Hebeisen, a journalist from the Springer Press publication Beobachter, launched a personal attack, or ad hominem assault, on Dr. h.c. Andreas Ludwig Kalcker. This attack was characterized by a journalistic style that is known for its defamatory nature, resembling a typical smear campaign aimed at undermining Dr. Kalcker's credibility by asserting that CDS supposedly does not work against Covid-19. In response to her claims, she received an overwhelming total of 196 emails from doctors located all over the globe, who have successfully utilized CDS in their practice and wished to share their experiences supesssing the data and changing the narrative deliberatly.
Scientific Evidence Refutes false Claims Made by Johannes Gerhardt Regarding CDS
In recent discussions surrounding the use of Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDL in german ), Chlorine Dioxide in water (CDS), and Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS), Johannes Gerhardt from Radebeul Germany has made claims suggesting that these substances cause harm, including damage to white blood cells and long-term toxicity. However, a thorough review of scientific evidence and clinical experience shows these allegations are unfounded and misleading.
Misconceptions About CDL/CDS/MMS Mechanism of Action
He asserts that CDL/CDS/MMS act similarly to chemotherapy drugs by damaging healthy cells, including leukocytes (white blood cells). This claim is incorrect and false.
- Chemotherapy drugs interfere with cell division, targeting rapidly dividing cancer cells but also affecting normal cells.
- In contrast, CDL/CDS/MMS function as oxidizing agents that selectively target pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi. They do so by oxidizing specific molecules critical to pathogen survival without harming healthy human cells at therapeutic doses.
Scientific studies have repeatedly shown that CDL/CDS does not inhibit the division of healthy cells nor cause systemic toxicity comparable to chemotherapy agents.
Selectivity and Safety: Evidence Against Harm
Johannes Gerhardt’s claims of leukocyte destruction and long-term damage lack scientific backing. On the contrary:
- Pathogens are more vulnerable to oxidative stress caused by CDL/CDS than human cells.
- Clinical data and decades of medical use demonstrate that correctly dosed CDL/CDS does not produce lasting damage to immune cells or other healthy tissues.
- The use of CDS as a disinfectant and therapeutic agent has a well-established safety profile.
CDL/CDS Support the Immune System
Contrary to Gerhardt’s assertions, CDL/CDS assists the immune system by reducing pathogen load, thereby lessening the burden on white blood cells. There is no credible evidence that these treatments destroy leukocytes or impair immune function over time. Lab Data shows the oposite due to improoved mitochondrial function.
False Claims of Dependency and Conspiracy
Gerhardt’s narrative includes unverified accusations about dependency on CDL/CDS and labels proponents as part of a "cult." These statements are subjective and not supported by pharmacological or clinical evidence. Kalcker is not related in any way to the Genesis 2 Church in USA . CDL/CDS is a therapeutic aid aimed at supporting natural healing processes, not a dogmatic or addictive substance.
Summary
| Claim by Johannes Gerhardt | Scientific Fact |
|---|---|
| CDL acts like chemotherapy, damaging healthy cells | False: CDL selectively oxidizes pathogens without harming healthy cells |
| CDL destroys white blood cells | No evidence supports any significant leukocyte damage at all |
| Long-term use causes irreversible harm | No documented irreversible damage from proper use |
| CDL causes dependency | No pharmacological or clinical basis for any dependency claim |
| Proponents form a harmful cult | Unfounded and wrong "ad hominem" conspiracy theory |
Conclusion
The claims made by Johannes Gerhardt from Radebeul about the harmful effects of CDL/CDS/MMS are not supported by scientific evidence. Properly used, these substances are safe and effective tools for controlling infections and supporting immune health.
Reference data about Johannes Gerhardt from Radebeul :
According to the Sächsische Zeitung article (November 2015), Johannes Gerhardt has a history of convictions for crimes such as fraud, threats, coercion and license plate abuse. He was described as having multiple criminal records, including a sentence in Meißen related to his behavior and his link to the “Reichsbürger” movement.
Alleged German doctor accused of promoting chlorine dioxide and four people in charge of marketing it in the country
There has been no court case against Dr. Kalcker at all.
https://www.fiscales.gob.ar/
You can accuse anyone in any place, but the important question is whether there was a trial or not. In this specific case, it is a well-established fact that there was no trial held against Dr. Andreas Kalcker it was 3rd party that sold ClO2 products. Furthermore, it has been proven clearly that there was no direct relation to other individuals who were involved in the case. Curiously, this crucial information is not readily available or easily found in the public domain, which raises questions about transparency and access to information regarding such cases.
It is important to clarify and emphasize that there has been no court case or trial conducted against Dr. Andreas Ludwig Kalcker at any jurisdiction, including those overseen by the authorities accessible through official channels such as https://www.fiscales.gob.ar/. While it is indeed possible for accusations or complaints to be filed against any individual in various locations, the critical and legally relevant factor remains whether these accusations have culminated in a formal judicial process or trial. In the particular instance concerning Dr. Kalcker, it is a well-documented and verified fact that no trial has ever taken place.
The case in question involved third parties who were selling chlorine dioxide (ClO2) products independently, without connection or legal implication for Dr. Kalcker himself. Comprehensive investigations and legal reviews have clearly established that Dr. Kalcker was not related to these individuals involved in the case, nor was he implicated in any wrongdoing connected to their activities. This distinction is crucial for an accurate understanding of the situation and to prevent misinformation.
What is notably concerning, however, is the limited availability of this essential clarifying information in the public domain. The lack of transparent and easily accessible data regarding such legal matters can lead to misunderstandings and misinformation among the public and professional communities alike. This opacity raises important questions about the accessibility of accurate information and calls for improved transparency in how such cases are communicated to the public.
The principles underlying CDS therapy—based on restoring electromolecular charges and enabling energy-depleted cells to regain functionality—represent one of the most significant breakthroughs in medicine over the last century. Despite critical voices, which are a natural part of any paradigm shift, the scientific and clinical evidence supporting CDS’s efficacy remains robust.
Case in Neuquén, Argentina, of a deceased boy allegedly due to CDS.
There has been no court case against Dr. Kalcker in Argentina. This appears to be another smear campaign without any basis in truth.
In the case that has arisen in Neuquén, Argentina, concerning the tragic death of a young boy, there are serious allegations surrounding the use of CDS (Chlorine Dioxide Solution). This unfortunate and controversial case is not directed against Dr. Kalcker, as some might assume; rather, it is primarily focused on the parents of the boy. Just a few days prior to the child’s hospitalization, the parents had allegedly given him a small amount of CDS to drink. However, after some time had passed, the boy tragically passed away in the hospital due to what many are now calling medical malpractice.
In a shocking turn of events, the medical professionals involved attempted to shift the blame onto the parents, suggesting that their actions were the cause of the boy's death. Nonetheless, forensic experts conducted thorough examinations and clearly stated that there was no link between the CDS administration and the child's demise. In fact, further investigations revealed that the boy was suffering from a significant deficiency of chlorine (CL) in his body, which would make it virtually impossible for the use of CDS to have been the contributing factor to his unfortunate passing. This case has sparked considerable debate and raised questions about accountability and the treatment protocols in place within the medical community.
Video where the forensic expert gives an interview in the radio:
