Peer reviews of contoversial Chlorine dioxide papers

From dioxipedia
Revision as of 11:36, 18 May 2025 by Andreas (talk | contribs)

On this page, we publish detailed reviews of reported scientific papers that express disagreement or skepticism regarding the claimed therapeutic properties of CDS. These reviews critically analyze the evidence presented in the studies, highlighting any inconsistencies, methodological flaws, or conflicting results that challenge the purported benefits of CDS as a treatment option.

  1. Peer Review Dudek-Wicher, R., Brożyna, M., Paleczny, J., & Mączyńska, B. (2024). No Miracle, Just a Mineral: The Not-So-Magical Antimicrobial World of Chlorine Dioxide. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.597186 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381143232_No_Miracle_Just_a_Mineral_The_Not-So-Magical_Antimicrobial_World_of_Chlorine_Dioxide Peer Review link here
  2. Peer Review Andrés CMC, Lastra JMP, Andrés Juan C, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. Chlorine Dioxide: Friend or Foe for Cell Biomolecules? A Chemical Approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 10;23(24):15660. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415660. PMID: 36555303; PMCID: PMC9779649. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9779649/?utm_source=chatgpt.com#sec5-ijms-23-15660 Peer Review Link here
Retrieved from "https://dioxipedia.com/index.php?title=Peer_reviews_of_contoversial_Chlorine_dioxide_papers&oldid=1383"