Controversia: Difference between revisions

From dioxipedia
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
[[Beobachter|'''Full Article''']]
[[Beobachter|'''Full Article''']]


'''Alleged German doctor accused of promoting chlorine dioxide and four people in charge of marketing it in the country <nowiki>https://www.fiscales.gob.ar/</nowiki>'''  
== Alleged German doctor accused of promoting chlorine dioxide and four people in charge of marketing it in the country ==
'''<nowiki>https://www.fiscales.gob.ar/</nowiki>'''  
[[File:Photo 2021-12-31 03-44-11.jpg|thumb]]
[[File:Photo 2021-12-31 03-44-11.jpg|thumb]]
You can accuse anyone in any place, but the important question is whether there was a trial or not. In this specific case, it is a well-established fact that there was no trial held against Dr. Andreas Kalcker. Furthermore, it has been proven clearly that there was no direct relation to other individuals who were involved in the case. Curiously, this crucial information is not readily available or easily found in the public domain, which raises questions about transparency and access to information regarding such cases.
You can accuse anyone in any place, but the important question is whether there was a trial or not. In this specific case, it is a well-established fact that there was no trial held against Dr. Andreas Kalcker it was 3rd party that sold ClO2 products. Furthermore, it has been proven clearly that there was no direct relation to other individuals who were involved in the case. Curiously, this crucial information is not readily available or easily found in the public domain, which raises questions about transparency and access to information regarding such cases.

Revision as of 11:26, 29 August 2024

Facts Instead of Fiction

Numerous experts and researchers have noted the prevalence of misleading statements regarding CDS (chlorine dioxide). This section aims to present factual and accurate information to correct misconceptions and clarify any confusion related to this topic.

Beobachter

Chantale Hebeisen, a journalist from the Springer Press publication Beobachter, launched a personal attack, or ad hominem assault, on Dr. h.c. Andreas Ludwig Kalcker. This attack was characterized by a journalistic style that is known for its defamatory nature, resembling a typical smear campaign aimed at undermining Dr. Kalcker's credibility by asserting that CDS supposedly does not work against Covid-19. In response to her claims, she received an overwhelming total of 196 emails from doctors located all over the globe, who have successfully utilized CDS in their practice and wished to share their experiences supesssing the data and changing the narrative deliberatly.

Full Article

Alleged German doctor accused of promoting chlorine dioxide and four people in charge of marketing it in the country

https://www.fiscales.gob.ar/

You can accuse anyone in any place, but the important question is whether there was a trial or not. In this specific case, it is a well-established fact that there was no trial held against Dr. Andreas Kalcker it was 3rd party that sold ClO2 products. Furthermore, it has been proven clearly that there was no direct relation to other individuals who were involved in the case. Curiously, this crucial information is not readily available or easily found in the public domain, which raises questions about transparency and access to information regarding such cases.