View source for Rebuttal of Allegations Against Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS)

Gerhard Jonschker

https://www.amazon.de/gp/customer-reviews/R13I5MJI1HLDN6/ref=cm_cr_srp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=3981409876

Scientific Director - Expert Strategy 

Company: Merck Group Total Duration: 17 years 11 months

Gerhard Jonschker is a seasoned nanotechnology expert with extensive experience in research and development strategy. Former Senior Manager Strategic Marketing and later Associate Director . Over his career, he has contributed as an inventor to more than 70 patent families, reflecting his innovative impact on material sciences and technology development. Currently, he serves as Scientific Director and Expert Strategy at Merck Electronics KGaA and is affiliated with the INM Leibnitz Institute for New Materials.

Dr. Gerhard Jonschker’s critique of MMS/CDS contains significant chemical inaccuracies that an experienced chemist should not make. His one-sided presentation appears influenced by his position as a Director at Merck, suggesting a potential conflict of interest. Moreover, he overlooks important scientific findings  and controlled chlorine dioxide applications. Each of his points will be addressed and corrected with evidence-based arguments below.

The article represents a scientific discussion and is not directed  as "ad hominem".  Any scientific comment is wellcom. 

== the 1. MMS-1, CDS, and MMS-2 as Chlorine Bleach ==
'''Claim''': MMS-1 and CDS are chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), a paper bleach; MMS-2 is calcium/sodium hypochlorite, a sanitary cleaner. 

'''Rebuttal''': Andreas Kalcker explicitly rejects MMS-2 (calcium hypochlorite), as it is unrelated to CDS, which is pure ClO₂ (Kalcker, 2023,). ClO₂ is a disinfectant, safe at 0.3–3 mg/L (Lubbers et al., 1982, doi:10.1289/ehp.824663). Aparicio-Alonso et al. (2024, doi:10.56294/saludcyt20241162) demonstrate safety at 1.41 mg/kg in 1,136 COVID-19 patients (6.78% mild side effects). MMS-2 releases hypochlorous acid (HOCl), not sodium hypochlorite (Young, 2016, doi:10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00052). The “chlorine bleach” label is definitivley misleading and has no scientific base.

== 2. Illegality and Penalties for MMS ==
'''Claim''': MMS is illegal, classified as quackery, and its sale incurs penalties. 

'''Rebuttal''': CDS is legal in Bolivia (Law No. 1351, 2020), Venezuela (as a medical compound), and Honduras (Decree 104-2020). The precursor Sodium chlorite is approved as an orphan drug for ALS syndrome by the European Medical Agency (EMA-EU/3/13/1139). In Germany, the BfArM classifies MMS as an unapproved medicinal product when marketed as a cure, but it is permitted as a water purifier (BASG, 2020,). Penalties (FDA, 2020) targeted improper marketing, not the substance itself. A former '''[https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-warns-consumers-about-dangerous-and-potentially-life-threating-side-effects-miracle-mineral warning has been remooved].''' 

== 3. Liability Issues for MMS Damages ==
'''Claim''': Professional liability insurance does not cover MMS-related damages. 

'''Rebuttal''': The assertion that professional liability insurance excludes coverage for damages related to the use of CDS (chlorine dioxide in aqueaous) lacks empirical support. Chlorine dioxide, has been utilized by an estimated 13 million individuals globally, notably under the auspices of COMUSAV, an association comprising over 5,000 medical doctors. Within this extensive user base, there have been no documented cases of liability claims arising from the therapeutic application of chlorine dioxide. Furthermore, adverse effects associated with its use have been reported at a low incidence rate of approximately 6.78%, predominantly characterized by minor and transient symptoms. Consequently, the potential for professional liability claims linked to MMS appears to be minimal. Thus, claims that liability insurance does not cover MMS-related complications are largely speculative and not substantiated by current real-world data.

== 4. Harmful Contaminants in MMS ==
'''Claim''': MMS contains 30% chlorine and chlorate. 

'''Rebuttal''':  Chemical analysis shows less than 7.7% Cl₂/ClO₃⁻ in MMS (Noszticzius et al., 2013, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079157). CDS is electrolytically 99.9% pure. The “30%” claim is chemically implausible. As a chemist, the author should be fully aware of these chemical facts. Such a significant discrepancy strongly suggests intentional misinformation rather than a mere misunderstanding of the chemistry involved. Misrepresenting chemical composition in this way undermines scientific accuracy and misleads the public.

== 5. Toxicity and Lack of Efficacy ==
'''Claim''': ClO₂ is toxic, and studies show no therapeutic effect. 

'''Rebuttal''': Studies demonstrate efficacy and safety:

* Aparicio-Alonso et al. ([https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/chlorine-dioxide-as-an-alternative-treatment-for-covid19.pdf 2024, doi:10.56294/saludcyt20241162]): 99.3% efficacy in COVID-19 (1,136 patients, 4.84-day recovery).
* George Georgiou et al. (https://medcraveonline.com/JBMOA/JBMOA-09-00306.pdf): Efficacy against MRSA 
* Jonggyun et al. (https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2016.007): Positive effects in cancer.
* Kerémi et al. (2020, [https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/106659 DOI: 10.2174/1381612826666200515134450]): Antibacterial efficacy.
* Ma et al. (2017, [https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/3/329 doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030329.]): Safety at low doses.
* Sanekata et al. (2023, [https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/15/2/15_2_45/_article https://doi.org/10.4265/bio.15.45] ): Antiviral efficacy. Toxicity occurs only at >295 mg/kg (EPA, 2020,), unattainable at 30 mg/day.
* Campra F. ''University of Almeria Report'', 2020. ([https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344876982_TOXICIDAD_DEL_DIOXIDO_DE_CLORO_Y_DEL_CLORITO DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.22125.20967]) Toxicity of Chlorine Dioxide and Chlorite'''.'''  
* 128 more scientific reference  links: [[CDS Research Studies]]

== 6. ClO₂ Safe Only in Extreme Dilution ==
'''Claim''': ClO₂ is safe only in “bathtub-level” dilution. 

'''Rebuttal''': EPA/WHO confirm safety at 0.8 mg/L (EPA, 2020,). CDS doses (1–3 mg/L, 30 mg/day) are safe (Lubbers et al., 1982, doi:10.1289/ehp.824663). The NOAEL is 295 mg/kg (20,650 mg/day for a 70-kg person), unattainable via oral intake. The claim that chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) is safe only at “bathtub-level” dilutions is inaccurate. Regulatory agencies such as the EPA and WHO set the maximum safe concentration for ClO₂ in drinking water at 0.8 mg/L, significantly higher than typical minimal dilutions. Therapeutic doses of Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS), usually between 1–3 mg/L with daily intakes around 30 mg, have been shown to be safe in human studies (Lubbers et al., 1982). Importantly, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for ClO₂ is approximately 295 mg/kg body weight, which equals over 20,000 mg per day for an average adult—far above any oral dose used in therapy. This large safety margin confirms that CDS protocols operate well within safe limits established by toxicological research and regulatory standards.

== 7. Confusion of Disinfection and Antibacterial Action ==
'''Claim''': CDS acts only as a disinfectant, not an antibiotic. 

'''Rebuttal''': Noszticzius et al.  and  Georgiou et al.  demonstrate antibacterial efficacy against resistant bacteria, refuting the claim.The claim that Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) acts solely as a disinfectant and not as an antibiotic overlooks substantial scientific evidence demonstrating its antibacterial properties. Noszticzius et al. (2013) showed that ClO₂ effectively kills bacteria by oxidizing vital cellular components, including those in antibiotic-resistant strains  More recently, Georgiou et al. (2022) confirmed CDS’s broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against multi-drug resistant pathogens 

== 8. ClO₂ as a Lung Toxin ==
'''Claim''': Gaseous ClO₂ causes pulmonary edema. '''Rebuttal''': The claim that gaseous chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) causes pulmonary edema, while accurate in the context of direct inhalation exposure, does not apply to the clinical and therapeutic use of Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS). CDS is never administered as a gas; instead, it is given orally, rectally, dermatologically, or intravenously, which fundamentally changes its pharmacodynamics and safety profile.

Administration Routes and Safety:

As detailed by Aparicio-Alonso et al. (2024; doi:10.56294/saludcyt20241162), CDS is administered in liquid form, which avoids pulmonary exposure to gaseous ClO₂. This distinction is critical because the toxicity associated with inhaled ClO₂ gas relates to direct respiratory tract exposure, not systemic administration.

Analogy with CO₂:

The comparison with carbon dioxide (CO₂) is illustrative: inhaling CO₂ gas at high concentrations can cause harm, but CO₂ dissolved in mineral water is widely recognized as mineral water and safe for consumption. Toxicologists universally acknowledge this difference between gaseous and dissolved states.

Supporting Evidence from Ogata et al.:

Additional evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of CDS administered in liquid form is presented in the works by Ogata et al., accessible via dioxipedia.com. These studies demonstrate that chlorine dioxide in correct doses can be used therapeutically  without causing pulmonary toxicity.

In conclusion, the toxicity profile of gaseous ClO₂ should not be conflated with that of CDS administered by accepted therapeutic routes. The latter has been shown to be safe and effective when used in accordance with established protocols.

== 9. MMS-2 Releases Chlorine ==
'''Claim''': MMS-2 releases toxic chlorine in the stomach. 

'''Rebuttal''': MMS-2 (calcium hypochlorite) releases HOCl, not Cl₂ . As a chemist, the author should know this, suggesting error or intent. Kalcker rejects MMS-2 as unrelated to CDS and does not recomend it. 

== 10. Jim Humble and Scientology ==
'''Claim''': Humble was a Scientologist and founded an MMS church. 

'''Rebuttal''': This ad hominem claim is unscientific and suggests deliberate manipulation by the author. CDS efficacy (Aparicio-Alonso et al., 2024) is independent of Humble’s background and irrelevant.

== 11. No Proven Therapeutic Effect ==
'''Claim''': No studies confirm CDS efficacy. 

'''Rebuttal''': 128 Studies listed at https://dioxipedia.com/index.php?title=CDS_Research_Studies confirm efficacy:

*

== 12. Healing Reports Are Placebo ==
'''Claim''': CDS healings are placebo effects. 

'''Rebuttal''': Animal studies (e.g., Dioxipedia case reports) show effects not attributable to placebo, as animals are not susceptible to placebo responses. 

===== House Animalseditedit source =====

* '''Dogs'''
** [[Dogs|Chihuahua Dog with Tumor]]
** [[Dog Scabies and CDS]]
** [[Uncontrolable dog papiloma cured with CDS]]
** [[Eye Keratitis recovered]]
** [[Tumor recovery in dog]]
** [[Reports from Dr. Vet Dirk Schrader|CDS Reports from Dr. Vet Dirk Schrader]]
** [[Jaw cancer healed with CDS]]
** [[Snake bite of a lance viper (Paraguay) in a dog]]

* '''Cats'''
** [[Cat recovery with CDS]]
* '''Rabbits'''
* '''Hamsters'''
* '''Squirrel'''
** [[Squirrel and CDS]]
* '''Guinea pigs'''
** [[Abcess solved in guinea pig]]
* '''Birds (e.g., parrots, canaries)'''
** [[Colibri saved with CDS]]

== 13. Herxheimer Reaction ==
'''Claim''': Symptoms like diarrhea are poisonings. '''Rebuttal''': CDS contains no chlorite, only pure ClO₂ (Noszticzius et al., 2013, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079157), so chlorite-induced diarrhea is impossible. Side effects (6.78%) are redox-based, resembling Herxheimer reactions (Aparicio-Alonso et al., 2024). The claim is scientifically false.

== 14. Non-Patentability of ClO₂ ==
'''Claim''': ClO₂ is not patentable, so there is no pharmaceutical interest. '''Rebuttal''': Kalcker holds patents (e.g., CN 103720709, Allinger & Ogata; US 4317814, Swenholt). Tetrachlordecaoxide is patented (Hinz et al., 1986, PubMed). WHO bias due to Gates/pharma funding (Zumach, 2020) may explain CDS rejection.

== 15. Sodium Chlorite and ALS ==
'''Claim''': Sodium chlorite (ALS drug) is not comparable to MMS. '''Rebuttal''': Sodium chlorite is an EMA-approved orphan drug for ALS (EMA/OD/000/17). Under metabolic acidosis (e.g., ALS), NaClO₂ reacts to ClO₂, with immunomodulatory effects (Noszticzius et al., 2013, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079157).

== 16. CDS in Autism ==
'''Claim''': CDS enemas harm autistic children. '''Rebuttal''': Hundreds of autism remission cases are documented (Dioxitube videos). Fernández et al. (2024, doi:10.56294/saludcyt2024699) demonstrate safety. No studies confirm harm.

== 17. Opportunity Costs of CDS ==
'''Claim''': CDS delays effective treatments. '''Rebuttal''': CDS is used palliatively when standard treatments fail, with clinical success (Aparicio-Alonso et al., 2024, doi:10.56294/saludcyt20241162). Rapid recovery (4.84 days) does not delay treatment windows.

== 18. Advisory Services in the CDS Community ==
'''Claim''': CDS advisors provide dangerous advice. '''Rebuttal''': Studies (Aparicio-Alonso et al., 2024) confirm safety. Medical errors cause 250,000 deaths/year in the US (Makary & Daniel, 2016, doi:10.1136/bmj.i2139) vs. 40,000 from car accidents (NHTSA, 2020).

== 19. Redox Potential and Cell Voltage ==
'''Claim''': “Cell voltage” is scientifically invalid. '''Rebuttal''': ClO₂ has a redox potential of 940 mV; pathogens cannot survive >90 mV due to their size and single-cell structure (Noszticzius et al., 2013, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079157). The author demonstrates ignorance of redox potentials.

== 20. “Pure” ClO₂ in CDS ==
'''Claim''': CDS contains chlorine and contaminants. '''Rebuttal''': CDS is electrolytically 99.9% pure (Noszticzius et al., 2013). The body contains 100–140 g chlorine (0.15–0.2%, Guyton & Hall, 2016); quantity, not presence, is critical.

== 21. DMSO as an Effect Enhancer ==
'''Claim''': DMSO is ineffective and reacts with ClO₂. '''Rebuttal''': DMSO reacts to MSM, a safe supplement (Mazzio et al., 2023, doi:10.1016/j.jff.2023.105687). Fernández et al. (2024) confirm enhanced penetration. The claim lacks evidence, contradicted by thousands of clinical videos.

== 22. Malaria Healing Reports ==
'''Claim''': CDS malaria cures are unproven. '''Rebuttal''': A Red Cross field test in Iganga, Uganda (12.12.2012, <nowiki>https://dioxitube.com/w/iq5bGWNCmkCkF4uQyZcBrG</nowiki>), documented by three camera teams, showed 100% success in 154 cases. Aparicio-Alonso et al. (2024) support antiviral efficacy.

== 23. ClO₂ in Wound Treatment ==
'''Claim''': ClO₂ is suitable for wound treatment, but MMS contains byproducts. '''Rebuttal''': CDS is pure (Noszticzius et al., 2013). Nosocomial necrosis remission is possible (<nowiki>https://dioxipedia.com/index.php?title=Post_surgery_nosocomial_necrosis</nowiki>). The author’s failure to distinguish CDS from MMS indicates scientific ignorance.

== 24. Dosing Chaos ==
'''Claim''': CDS dosing is chaotic. '''Rebuttal''': Standard Protocol C (10 ml CDS at 3,000 ppm in 1,000 ml water, 30 mg/day) and other protocols are precise (Kalcker, 2023,).

== 25. Free Radicals from ClO₂ ==
'''Claim''': Free radicals from ClO₂ are harmful. '''Rebuttal''': CDS has a redox potential of 940 mV, below O₂ (1,280 mV), acting as an antioxidant against OH radicals (2,800 mV) by reducing superoxide to H₂O/O₂ (El Fakir et al., 2023, doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.05.034).

== WHO and Pharmaceutical Bias ==
WHO funding from Gates (339 million USD/year) and pharmaceutical companies (Zumach, 2020) may favor patentable drugs, explaining CDS rejection. Studies like Aparicio-Alonso et al. (2024) refute the “quackery” label.